<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Barbie Versus Bratz: Deathmatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fairplaythings.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fairplaythings.com/blog/?p=695</link>
	<description>Toy musings from fairplaythings.com</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 15:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kirilaw</title>
		<link>http://fairplaythings.com/blog/?p=695#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>kirilaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fairplaythings.com/blog/?p=695#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Bear in mind, though, that the Bratz lawsuit isn't about Bratz dolls looking like Barbie -- it's based on the fact that their inventor was on a contract with Mattel at the time that he invented them, making anything he thought up legally Mattel's property. That's a whole 'nother ethical kettle of fish, but it's not actually the same case as the original "inspiration" for Barbie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bear in mind, though, that the Bratz lawsuit isn&#8217;t about Bratz dolls looking like Barbie &#8212; it&#8217;s based on the fact that their inventor was on a contract with Mattel at the time that he invented them, making anything he thought up legally Mattel&#8217;s property. That&#8217;s a whole &#8216;nother ethical kettle of fish, but it&#8217;s not actually the same case as the original &#8220;inspiration&#8221; for Barbie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
